
The International Accreditation Forum, Inc. (IAF) is the world association of Conformity Assessment Accreditation Bodies and other bodies interested in conformity assessment in the fields of management systems, products, services, personnel and other similar programmes of conformity assessment. Its primary function is to develop a single worldwide program of conformity assessment which reduces risk for business and its customers by assuring them that accredited certificates may be relied upon. Accreditation assures users of the competence and impartiality of the body accredited. IAF members accredit certification or registration bodies that issue certificates attesting that an organization's management, products or personnel comply with a specified standard (called conformity assessment).
The primary purpose of IAF is two-fold. Firstly, to ensure that its accreditation body members only accredit bodies that are competent to do the work they undertake and are not subject to conflicts of interest. The second purpose of the IAF is to establish mutual recognition arrangements, known as Multilateral Recognition Arrangements (MLA), between its accreditation body members which reduces risk to business and its customers by ensuring that an accredited certificate may be relied upon anywhere in the world. The MLA contributes to the freedom of world trade by eliminating technical barriers to trade. IAF works to find the most effective way of achieving a single system that will allow companies with an accredited conformity assessment certificate in one part of the world, to have that certificate recognised else where in the world. The objective of the MLA is that it will cover all accreditation bodies in all countries in the world, thus eliminating the need for suppliers of products or services to be certified in each country where they sell their products or services. Certified once - accepted everywhere.
Standards are documented agreements containing technical specifications or other precise criteria to be used consistently as rules, guidelines, or definitions of characteristics, to ensure that materials, products, processes and services are fit for their purpose.
The format of the credit cards, phone cards, and "smart" cards that have become commonplace is derived from an ISO International Standard. Adhering to the standard, which defines such features as an optimal thickness (0,76 mm), means that the cards can be used worldwide.
Industry-wide standardisation results from consensus agreements reached between all economic players in that industrial sector - suppliers, users, and governments. They agree on specifications and criteria to be applied consistently in the choice and classification of materials, the manufacture of products and the provision of services.
International commerce, exports and imports would be impossible for many industries if different countries had different standards for the same product. International standards for products would result in the same standard set for the same product internationally, a fall in production costs and, an increase in competition between manufacturers therefore lowering prices for consumers.
Where different countries have standards for the same products with different requirements, manufacturers in other countries face increased costs if they wish to export to a country with different standards. This is called "technical barriers to trade". If all countries agree to adopt the same standard for the same product, the cost of production falls and competition between manufacturers in different countries increases, making it possible for consumers to get lower prices.
In many industries international commerce would be impossible if countries adopt different standards. For example telecommunications, information processing, banking and financial services could not operate across national boundaries if they did not all obey the same rules.
Standards facilitate trade, exchange and technology transfer through:
Customers and users need to be assured that products and services conform to the same standard internationally. Certificates of conformity to specified standards issued by certification / registration bodies accredited by IAF MLA members, gives customers and users the assurance they need to conduct business.
Conformity assessment is the process by which a body, that is known to be competent and credible, issues a certificate that a particular business or product will comply with a particular standard. The competence and credibility of a certification / registration body is normally assured when it is accredited by an IAF MLA member. Conformity assessment provides benefits for manufacturers and service providers, consumers and government regulators, as well as for international trade in general.
For conscientious manufacturers and service providers, having their products assessed and certified as conforming to a particular standard allows them to distinguish themselves from less reputable suppliers.
Consumers benefit from conformity assessment because it provides them with a basis for selecting products or services. They may have more confidence in products or services that bear a mark or certificate of conformity that attests to quality, safety or other desirable characteristics.
Regulators benefit from conformity assessment which gives them a means of enforcing governmental health, safety and environmental legislation.
Harmonizing conformity assessment procedures around the world also has far-reaching benefits for international trade in general. Agreements among nations or regions on the mutual acceptability of requirements, assessment methods, inspection or test results, etc., can all help to reduce or remove so-called technical barriers to trade.
IAF works closely with ISO and the WTO to ensure that the benefits of conformity assessment are available to all businesses and customers in all countries.
First-party assessment. This is the technical term used when conformity assessment to a standard, specification or regulation is carried out by the supplier organisation itself. In other words, it is a self-assessment.
Second-party assessment. This indicates that a customer of the supplier organisation carries out the conformity assessment. For example, the supplier invites a potential customer to verify that the products that it is offering conform to relevant product standards.
Third-party assessment. The conformity assessment is performed by a body that is independent of both supplier and customer organisations. An example is ISO 9000 certification where an organisation's quality management system is assessed by an independent "certification" or "registration" body against the requirements of an ISO 9000 standard. If the system conforms to the requirements, the certification/registration body issues the organization with an ISO 9000 certificate.
The value of third party assessment lies in the independence and competence of the third-party certification/registration body. Accreditation of a certification/registration body assures customers, users and government regulators that a product or service fully complies with relevant standards. Standards are constantly under careful surveillance by the accreditation body, which demonstrates the independence and competence of the certification/registration body.
`
Profile
The NATIONAL ASSESSMENT AND ACCREDITATION COUNCIL (NAAC) is an autonomous body established by the University Grants Commission (UGC) of India to assess and accredit institutions of higher education in the country. It is an outcome of the recommendations of the National Policy in Education (1986) that laid special emphasis on upholding the quality of higher education in India.
Governance
The activities and future plans of the NAAC are guided by its vision and mission that focus on making quality assurance an integral part of the functioning of higher education institutions.
The vision of the NAAC is:
To make quality the defining element of higher education in India through a combination of self and external quality evaluation, promotion and sustenance initiatives.
Guided by its vision and striving to achieve its mission, the NAAC primarily assesses the quality of institutions of higher education that volunteer for the process, through an internationally accepted methodology.
The Methodology
For the assessment of a unit, the NAAC follows a
three-stage process which is a combination of self-study and
peer review. The three stages are: